بررسی ویژگی‌های کیفی پرتقال تامسون تولیدی استان گلستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار پژوهش بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

سابقه و هدف: ضایعات محصولات باغبانی شامل ضایعات کمی و کیفی از تولید تا مصرف می‌باشد. سه عامل زمان برداشت، مدت انبارمانی و اقلیم، کیفیت میوه و در نتیجه میزان ضایعات را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد. شاخص‌های گوناگونی جهت تعیین زمان برداشت مناسب مد نظر است. مهم‌ترین آنها در مورد پرتقال شاخص بلوغ (نسبت مواد جامد محلول کل به اسید قابل تیتراسیون)، مواد جامد محلول کل و میزان عصاره می‌باشد. مدت زمان انبارمانی پرتقال به شرایط تولید نظیر اقلیم، مدیریت باغ، زمان برداشت و شرایط انبارمانی بستگی دارد. به دلیل کمبود اطلاعات پایه و ضروری در رابطه با پرتقال تولید شده در استان گلستان، این تحقیق با هدف تعیین کیفیت میوه در زمان برداشت و پس از انبارمانی به مرحله اجرا درآمد.

مواد و روش‌ها: در این تحقیق با توجه به گستردگی باغات مرکبات و تنوع اقلیمی گلستان، استان به سه ناحیه غرب (کردکوی و بندرگز)، مرکز (علی آباد و گرگان) و شرق (آزادشهر) تقسیم و در هر ناحیه تعدادی باغ با مدیریت یکسان انتخاب شد. نمونه‌ها در هر باغ در دو زمان (هنگامی که کمتر از 10 درصد سطح میوه تغییر رنگ داده و هنگامی که بیش از 90 درصد سطح میوه تغییر رنگ داده) برداشت شد. سپس، نمونه‌های هر ناحیه در هر تاریخ برداشت با هم مخلوط و نهایتاً یک نمونه مرکب جهت انجام آزمایشات اخذ ‌گردید. نمونه‌ها در شرایط 6-4 درجه سلسیوس و رطوبت نسبی 90-85 درصد انبار شد. ویژگی‌های کیفی میوه نظیر اسید قابل تیتراسیون، مواد جامد محلول کل، شاخص بلوغ، pH، میزان اسید اسکوربیک، میزان قند کل، قندهای احیا کننده و ساکارز در زمان برداشت و پس از 2 و 4 ماه انبارداری با استفاده از روش‌های ذکر شده در استانداردرملی ایران به شماره‌های 2685 (تجدید نظر اول) و 2-14617 آزمون گردید. داده‌های آزمایش با استفاده از طرح آماری فاکتوریل 3×3×2 (دو سطح زمان برداشت، سه سطح ناحیه برداشت و سه سطح مدت انبارمانی زمان صفر، 2 و 4 ماه نگهداری) و در سه تکرار و نرم افزار SAS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که مکان برداشت تاثیر معنی‌دار بر ویژگی‌های اسید قابل تیتراسیون (01/0≥p)، مواد جامد محلول (01/0≥p) و شاخص بلوغ (05/0≥p) داشت، لیکن بر ویژگی‌های اسید آسکوربیک، میزان قند کل و احیا تاثیر معنی‌داری (01/0≥p) نداشت. زمان برداشت نیز بر اسید قابل تیتراسیون، شاخص بلوغ و اسید آسکوربیک تاثیرگذار بود (01/0≥p) لیکن بر ویژگی‌های مواد جامد محلول، قند کل و احیا تاثیری نداشت. مدت انبارمانی نیز بجز قند کل سایر ویژگی‌های کیفی میوه شامل اسید قابل تیتراسیون، مواد جامد محلول، شاخص بلوغ، اسید آسکوربیک و قند احیا را تحت تاثیر معنی‌دار خود (01/0≥p) قرار داد. نتایج نشان داد که اسید قابل تیتراسیون، اسید اسکوربیک، مواد جامد محلول کل، شاخص بلوغ، قند کل، قند احیاء و ساکارز به‌ترتیب در دامنه 67/1-76/0 گرم در 100 میلی‌لیتر، 16/40-04/11 میلی‌گرم در 100 گرم، 43/11-88/8 درجه بریکس، 34/13-34/6، 16/9-76/5 گرم در 100 گرم، 54/4-01/3 گرم در 100 گرم و 83/4-10/3 گرم در 100 گرم قرار داشت.

نتیجه‌گیری: نمونه‌های ناحیه مرکز استان دارای بیشینه میزان عصاره و اسید کل و کمینه مقدار اسیدیته، مواد جامد محلول و شاخص بلوغ بودند. زمان برداشت دوم نیز موجب کاهش اسید کل و افزایش شاخص بلوغ گردید. انبارمانی نیز میزان عصاره، اسیدیته، اسید اسکوربیک، مواد جامد محلول، شاخص بلوغ و قند احیا را افزایش و میزان اسید کل و ساکارز را کاهش (01/0≥p) داد. بر اساس نتایج حاصله می‌توان بیان نمود نمونه‌های ناحیه مرکز در مقایسه با دو مکان دیگر باید دیرتر برداشت شوند تا کیفیت مطلوب‌تری داشته باشند. انبارمانی گرچه منجر به تغییراتی در تعدادی از صفات بررسی شده داشت لیکن می‌توان بیان نمود که میوه‌های باغات استان گلستان پتانسیل انبارمانی به مدت چهارماه را دارا هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Thomson Orange Produced in Golestan Province

نویسنده [English]

  • Alireza Ghodsvali
1Associated Professor at Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and objectives: The losses of horticultural products encompass both quantitative and qualitative losses from production to consumption. Three factors—harvesting time, storage, and climate—impact fruit quality and, consequently, lead to losses. Various indices are utilized to determine the proper harvesting time, with the most important ones for oranges being the maturity index (TSS/TA), total soluble solids (TSS), and extract content. Considering the weather conditions in each area, all these indices should be determined when the fruit is ripe. Additionally, fruit storage is contingent on production conditions such as climate, orchard management, harvesting time, and storage conditions. Due to the lack of necessary information about oranges produced in Golestan province, this research was conducted to determine fruit quality at harvesting time as well as after storage.

Materials and methods: In this study, considering the extent of citrus orchards and climatic diversity in Golestan province, the province was divided into three areas (west, Kordkoy and Bandarqs), center (Aliabad and Gorgan) and east (Azadshahr)..In each area some orchards with similar management were selected. Fruits were harvested from a number of trees in each orchard at two times (first half of the harvesting season, when less than 10% of the fruit surface discolored and the bottom half, when more than 90% of the fruit surface discolored). Then, samples from each area were mixed at each harvesting date and finally a mixed sample was obtained. Fruits were stored at 4-6 °C and 85-90% relative humidity. Characteristics related to fruit quality, such as titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solids (TSS), Maturity Index (TSS/TA), acidity, ascorbic acid, total sugar, reducing sugar and sucrose according to the method described by the Iran National Standards Organization (No 2685 and 14617-2) at harvesting time, after two and four months of storage Was examined. Data were analyzed by using factorial statistical design.

Results: The results showed that harvesting location had significant effect (p≥0.01) on TA and TSS as well as maturity index (p≥0.05) but had no significant effect (p≥0.01) on ascorbic acid, total and reducing sugar content. Harvesting time also affected TA, maturity index and ascorbic acid (p≥0.01) but had no effect on TSS, total and reducing sugar. Storage period affected qualitative characteristics of fruits included TA, TSS, maturity index, ascorbic acid and reducing sugar, except total sugar. The results showed that TA, ascorbic acid, TSS, maturity index, total sugar, reducing sugar and sucrose were in the range of 0.76-1.76 gram in100 mL juice, 11.4-40.16 milligram in100 gram juice, 8.88- 11.43 Brix, 6.34-13.34, 5.76-9.16 gram in100 gram juice, 3.01- 4.54 gram in 100 gram juice and 3.10-4.83 gram in100 gram juice, respectively.

Conclusion: The fruits of the center of province had the highest amount of extract, total acid and lowest acidity, soluble solids and maturity index. The second harvesting time also reducing total acid and increased maturity index. The storage duration also increased the amount of extract, acidity, ascorbic acid, total soluble solids, maturity index and reducing sugar and decreased total acid and sucrose. Based on the results, it can be stated that samples from the center area should be picked up later than the other two sites to achieve better quality. Although storage duration had led to changes in some of the characteristics investigated, it can be stated that the fruit of the Golestan orchards had the potential of storage for four months.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Biochemical characteristics
  • Harvesting time
  • Orange
  • physical properties
  • Storage time
  1. Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad. 2022. Statistical yearbook, vol. 3, Horticultural and Greenhouse products. Tehran, Iran.
  2. 2021. “Food and Agricultural commodities production”. Available from: <http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx>. Last updated January 2013.
  3. Mannheim, C., and Soffer, T. 1996. Permeability of different wax coatings and their effect on citrus fruit quality. Food Chemistry. 44: 919–923.
  4. Fotouhi Ghazvini, R., and Fattahi Moghaddam, J. 2010. Citrus Growing in Iran. Third Edition. University of Guilan Press, Iran. 350p. (In Persian).
  5. Stearns, C. J., and Young, G, T. 1942. The relation of climatic conditions to colour development in citrus fruit. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society. 56: 39-61.
  6. Knee, M., Tsantili, E., and Hatfield, S.G.S. 1988. Promotion and inhibition by ethylene of chlorophyll degradation in orange fruits. Annals of Applied Biology. 113:129–135.
  7. Ershadi, A. 2006. Post-Harvest Physiology Booklet, Bu Ali Sina University. (In Persian).
  8. Fattahi Moghadam, J., and Faghih Nasiri, M. 2005. Course of action for citrus harvesting, storage, grading and packaging strategies. Extension published. Media Division, Agricultural Jihad Organization of Mazandaran Province. (In Persian).
  9. Jemriic, T., and Pavicic, N. 2004. Postharvest treatments of Satsuma Mandarin (Citrus Unshiu) for the improvement of storage life and quality. Production practices and quality assessment of food crops. 4: 213-227.
  10. Ladaniya, M.S. 2008. Citrus fruit: biology, technology and evaluation, Elsevier Inc, 558p.
  11. Shakarzadeh, A. 1995. Investigation and determination of the most appropriate harvesting time for Siahvarz oranges (aborigine) in Khuzestan Condition. Agricultural Research Center of Safiabad, Dezful, Iran. (In Persian).
  12. Shakarzadeh, A., Chinipardaz, S., Sherafatian, D., and Kiani, M. 1995. Evaluation of the most appropriate harvesting time for Valencia oranges in Dezful. Agricultural Research Center of Safiabad, Dezful, Iran. (In Persian).
  13. Makinde, A. A., Afolayan, S. O., Olaniyan, A. A., Odeleye, O. M. O., and Okafor. B. N. 2011. Effect of climate on citrus yield in rainforestsavanna transitional zone of Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2:10–13.
  14. Kimbell, D. 1991. Citrus processing quality control and technology, Van No strand Reinhold.
  15. Iqbal, M., Khan, M. N., Zafar, M., and Munir, M. 2012. Effect of harvesting date on fruit size, fruit weight and total soluble solids of feutrell’s early and kinnow cultivars of Mardan (Citrus reticulata) on the economic conditions of farming community of Faisalabad. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 28:1. 19-21.
  16. Sinclair, W.B. 1984. Biochemistry and physiology of the lemon and other citrus fruits. Univ. of Calif. and Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA. 946p.
  17. Frometa, E., and Echazabal, J. 1988. Influence of age and cultivar on the juice characteristics of early oranges. Agrotecnia de Cuba. 20:1.71-75.
  18. Davies, F. S. 1997. An overview of climatic effects on citrus flowering and fruit quality in various parts of the world. In H.F. Stephen and J.K. Walter, (eds). Citrus Flowering and Fruiting Short Course. University of Florida Press. Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  19. Davies, F. S., and Albrigo. L.G. 1994. Citrus. CAB International Press. Wallingford, UK. 254p.
  20. Mangels, A. R., Block, G., Frey, C. M., Patterson, B. L., Taylor, P. R., Norkus, E. P., and Levander, O. A. 1993. The Bioavailability to Humans of Ascorbic Acid from Oranges, Orange Juice and Cooked Broccoli Is Similar to That of Synthetic Ascorbic Acid. The Journal of Nutrition, 123:1054-1061.
  21. González-Molina, E., Moreno, D. A., and García-Viguera, C. 2008. Genotype and harvest time influence the phytochemical quality of Fino lemon juice (Citrus limon L.) Burm. F.) for industrial use. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 56: 1669-1675.
  22. Sites, J.W., Reitz, H.J., and Deszyck, E.J. 1951. Some results of irrigation research with Florida Citrus. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 64, pp.71-79.
  23. de Andrade R. S. G., Diniz, M. C. T., Neves E. A., and Nobrega, J. A. 2002. Determinação e distribuição de ácidoascórbicoemtrêsfrutos tropicais. Eclética Quím, 27: 393-401.
  24. Paixão, T. R. L. C., Lowinsohn, D., and Bertotti, M. 2006. Use of an electrochemically etched platinum microelectrode for ascorbic acid mapping in oranges. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 54:3072-3077.
  25. Samson, J.A. 1986. Citrus, Tropical Fruits. Longman Scientific and Technical Essex, New York.73-138.
  26. Cepeda, J.S., Bringas, E., and Balz, M. 1993. Ascobic acid and quality losses of valencia oranges stored on trees. Horticulture Science. 28: 581.
  27. Manzano J.E., and Diaz A. 2001. Effect of storage time, temperature and wax coating on the quality of fruits of ‘Valencia’ orange (Citrus sinensis). Proceedings of the Interamerican Society for Tropical Horticulture, 44, pp.24–29. 46th Annual meeting, Miami, Florida-24 to 29 september 2000.
  28. Hamedani, M., Moradi, H., and Ghanbari, A. 2014. Effect of Harvest Time and Storage on Moro Blood Orange Fruit Quality (Citrus sinensis Moro). Journal of Horticultural Science. 28:2.252-259. (In Persian).
  29. Spiegel-Roy, P., and Goldschmidt, E.E. 1996. Biology of Citrus, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. 230p.
  30. Adoli, B., Samaneh, R., and Golein, b. 2005. Citrus cultivars and rootstocks. Extension published. Media Division, Agricultural Jihad Organization of Mazandaran Province. (In Persian).
  31. Ebrahimi, Y. 1980. Citrus evolutionary in Iran. Journal of Seed and Planting Improvement Institute.1. (In Persian).
  32. Iran National Standards Organization. 1998. Fruit juices – Test methods, standard No. 2685, (1st revision). (In Persian).
  33. Iran National Standards Organization. 1998. Friuts, vegetables and derived products determination of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) - (Routine method), standard No. 14617-2. (In Persian).
  34. Sinclair, W.B. 1961. Principal juice constituents. Sinclair, W.B. (ed). The orange: its biochemistry and physiology. Chapter 5, p 131-160. University of California, division of agricultural sciences, Berkley, USA.
  35. Din, A., Asghar, M., Parveen, S., and Azhar Ali, M. 2012. Evaluation of kinnow mandarin as influenced by pre-harvest management practices. Journal of Agricultural Research. 50:3.381-392.
  36. Khan, A.S., Naseer, M., Malik, A.U., Basra, S.M.A., Khalid, M.S., Khalid, S., Amin, M., Saleem, B.A., Rajwana, I. A., and  Ud Din, M. 2011. Location, soil and tree nutrients affect quality of ‘kinnow’ mandarin. International journal of agriculture & biology. 13:4.498–504.
  37. Agusti, M., Mesejo, C., Reig, C., and Matinez-Fuentes, A. 2014. Citrus production. Dixon, G.R. and. Aldous, D. E. (eds): Horticulture: Plants for People and Places, 1. Pp:174-176. Production Horticulture. Springer.
  38. Rab , A., Rahman, J., Sajid, M., Ahmad, N., Ahmad, M., Nawab, K., and Ali, K. 2016. Influence of Harvesting Dates on Fruit Quality and Storage Performance of Sweet Orange (Blood Red) Fruit. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 26(6): 1659-1665.
  39. Kassim, A., Workneh, T.S., and Laing, M.D. 2020. A review of the postharvest characteristics and pre-packaging treatments of citrus fruit. Aims Agriculture and Foods. 5(3):337-364.
  40. Siddiq, M. 2012. Tropical and Subtropical Fruits: Postharvest Physiology, Processing and Packaging. John Wiley Sons, Iowa. pp 1-611.
  41. Zhang, J., Zhang, J.Y., Shan, Y.X., Can, G., Lian, H.E., Zhang, L.Y., Wei, L., Liang, Y., and Zhong, B.L. 2022. Effect of harvest time on the chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of Gannan navel orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck ‘Newhall’) juice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture.21:261–272.
  42. Riaz, M., Zamir, T., Rashid, N., Jamil, N., Masood, Z., Jabeen, U., Mandokhel, F., Behlil, F., Mengal, F., & Khan, M. 2015. Quality Assessment in Different Stages of Maturity of Fruits, mandarins Kinnow and Feutrell’s Early Collected from the Fruit Market of Quetta City at in Relation to Their Benefits for Human Health. American-Eurasian Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 7:3.203-208.
  43. Hussain, S.B., Shi, C.Y., Guo, L.X., Kamran, H.M., Sadka, A., and Liu, Y.Z. 2017. Recent advances in the regulation of citric acid metabolism in citrus fruit. Critical. Reviews in Plant Sciences. 36:241–256.
  44. Bakhshi, J.C., Singh, G.,and Singh, K.K. 1968. Effect of time of picking on fruit quality and subsequent cropping of Valencia Late of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Indian Journal of Horticulture. 24:63-70.
  45. Joolka, N.K. & Awashti, R.P. 1990. Studies on maturity standards of Kinnow in Himachal Pardesh. Punjab Horticulture Journal. 20:3/4.149-151.
  46. Albertini, M.V., Carcouet, E., Pailly, O., Gambotti, C., Luro, F.,and Berti, L. 2006. Changes in organic acids and sugars during early stages of development of acidic and acidless citrus fruit. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 54:8335–8339.
  47. Ladaniya, M.S., and Mahalle, B. 2011.Fruit maturation and associated changes in ‘Mosambi’ orange (Citrus sinensis) Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 81:494–499.
  48. Mohammad Hosseini, Z., Hashemi, M., Mohammadi, A., Badie, F., Eshghi, S., Ahmadi, K. & Ghanati, K. 2013. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Thomson navel orange during storage. Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology. 8:1.209-217. (In Persian).
  49. Fattahi Moghadam, J. & Kiaeshkevarian, M. 2013. Response of bioactive compounds in some citrus fruits to wax coating during storage. Journal of Plant Production. 20:2.59-72. (In Persian).
  50. Afra, P. & Naseri, L. 2018. Effect of Zn-oxide nanoparticles coating on physicochemical properties, enzymatic activity and storage life of sweet cheery cv. Takdaneh Mashhad (Prunus avium). Pomology Research. 3:1.57-66. (In Persian).
  51. Alhassan, A., Adjei, P.Y., and Mohammed, S. 2014. Effect of maturity stage and storage duration on physico-chemical properties of citrus (Citrus sinesis var. Late Valencia). European Scientific Journal.10 (36):148-162.
  52. Shamloo, M.M., Sharifani, M., DaraeiGarmakhany, A., and Seifi, E. 2015. Alternation of secondary metabolites and quality attributes in Valencia Orange fruit (Citrus sinensis) as influenced by storage period and edible covers. Journal Food Science Technology. 52:4.936–1947.
  53. Goldschmidt, E. E., and Koch, K. C. 1996. Citrus, in Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops – source-sink relationships. Zamski, E. & Schaffer, A. (Eds). Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops: Source-sinks relationships. pp. 797–823. New York NY, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc.
  54. Komatsu, A., Moriguchi, T., Koyama, K., Omura, M., and Akihama, T. 2002. Analysis of sucrose synthase genes in citrus suggests different roles and phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Experimental Botany. 53:61–71.
  55. Hiratsuka, S., Nakayama, S., Tamura, S. & Nada, K. 2017. Translocation and accumulation of fruit-fixed photosynthate in Satsuma mandarin. Plant Growth Regulation. 81: 277–282.
  56. Roitsch, T., and Gonzalez, M. C. 2004. Function and regulation of plant invertases: sweet sensations. Trends Plant Science. 9:606–613.
  57. Rab, A., Haq, S. Khalil, S.A., and Ali, S.G. 2010. Fruit quality and senescence related changes in Sweet Orange Cultivar Blood Red unipacked in different packing materials. Sarhad Journal Agriculture. 26:221-227.